How to ask

Start here: it is not unusual to ask

The framing you will meet is that the package is standard and final. That framing does real work for the employer.

Severance is usually offered in exchange for a signed release, and many employers have some way to ask questions about or request changes to the terms.

That exchange is the key to the whole module. The employer wants your signature. The release is the product being purchased. That is leverage, and it exists whether or not you have a legal claim.

You will also see claims online that a specific percentage of people who negotiate get more, often with impressive-looking numbers. Those figures usually trace back to law firm marketing pages without a cited study. Treat them as unverified. The honest statement is narrower and still useful: asking is common, there is usually a process, and the downside of a polite, specific, written ask is close to zero.

---

What is usually fixed, and what is not

The base formula, typically weeks of pay per year of service, is usually genuinely fixed. It is set by policy and applied across a group, and deviating for one person creates discrimination exposure for the employer. Attacking it directly is the least likely ask to succeed.

Almost everything else is discretionary:

Ask	Typical cost to employer	Typical value to you
Move the separation date later	Low	Can cross an equity vesting date, a bonus date or a severance tier
Extend the option exercise window	No cash cost	Sometimes larger than the entire severance
Additional months of COBRA contribution	Moderate	Direct and immediate
Agreed written reference language	None	Significant for the next job
Non-contest of your unemployment claim	None	Removes a risk
Outplacement, or cash instead of it	Low	Varies
Pay accrued time separately and correctly	None, it is already owed	Accuracy, and clean records
Strike or narrow a specific clause	Low if narrow	Can be very high
Shift payment timing across tax years	None	Potentially meaningful at the margin
Mutual non-disparagement	None	Protects you symmetrically

Notice the pattern: the asks that are most valuable to you are often the cheapest for them.

---

The order to ask in

1. Fix accuracy first. Wrong separation date, missing accrued vacation, an inaccurate “no pending claims” recital. These are corrections, not negotiations, and they are almost always granted. They also establish that you are reading carefully.
2. Ask for the documents. Everything incorporated by reference. This is a right, not a favor.
3. Then ask for the one or two things that matter most. Not seven things. Two.
4. Then, if relevant, raise anything legally significant. A missing statutory carve-out, a consideration period shorter than the federal floor, a clause that conflicts with California law. Raise these as questions, not accusations.

---

The email that works

Short. Warm. Specific. One or two asks. A reason attached to each. No threats, no history, no grievance.

Hi [name],

Thank you for sending this through, and for walking me through it on [day].

I have reviewed the agreement and I have two requests before I sign.

First, the separation date is listed as [date]. My next equity vesting date is [date], about three weeks later. Would you consider setting the separation date at [later date]? I understand the severance formula is standard and I am not asking to change it.

Second, the agreement provides [X] months of COBRA contribution. I am covering a family and the difference between [X] and [Y] months would make a real difference while I am looking. Would [Y] be possible?

I appreciate you looking at these. Happy to sign as soon as they are addressed.

Best, [name]

Why this works:

• It is easy to forward up an approval chain.
• Each ask has a reason, and reasons are what get approved.
• It concedes the thing they cannot change, which makes the asks credible.
• It ends with a clear path to yes.
• It never argues about the past.

---

Behind the curtain: Employers negotiate when the legal apparatus around the decision senses residual risk: an incomplete performance file, a close-in-time protected activity, or a poorly documented reorg. Understanding that the other side thinks in risk probabilities, not in moral terms, is what lets you ask precisely for what reduces that risk for both parties.

When there is more leverage than usual

Some facts change the shape of a negotiation. You do not need to assert anything about them. You only need to know whether they are true.

• You are 40 or over and the agreement does not provide the federal 21 or 45 days plus 7-day revocation.
• You raised a concern about something you believed was unlawful shortly before the process began.
• You requested or took a protected leave, or disclosed a medical condition or pregnancy, shortly before.
• You have unpaid commissions, unpaid overtime, or unreimbursed business expenses.
• Your accrued vacation or PTO is not being paid out correctly.
• The agreement contains a clause that is void in California, such as a non-compete.
• The layoff may be covered by the California WARN Act and no 60-day notice was given.

If two or more are true, this is the point to spend one hour with an employment lawyer before you respond. That hour frequently pays for itself many times over, and consultations are often free or flat-fee. See Where to get help.

---

Sequence matters as much as the ask

Anchor the clock in writing, first. Before you negotiate anything, send one short email acknowledging receipt of the agreement and stating that you will use the full consideration period to review it with counsel: the 21 or 45 days federal law gives workers 40 and over, or the minimum five business days California gives everyone. That single message does quiet work. It makes the deadline a shared fact rather than a pressure instrument, it makes any later claim that you were given time and wasted it harder to sustain, and it buys you the space to do everything else in this module in the right order.

Negotiate privately before anything is filed anywhere. An agency charge is a right, and for some claims it becomes necessary. But it does not have to be the first move, and there are reasons it usually should not be. An employer’s incentive to improve an offer is at its highest while the dispute is still a private matter it can close with a signature. Once a charge is filed, the file changes hands inside the company, from the people who settle to the people who defend, and the conversation changes with it. So the usual order is: anchor the clock, review, ask privately, and keep the agency route in reserve. Two cautions ride along with that. Agency filing deadlines keep running while you negotiate, so calendar them on day one and confirm the exact dates with counsel rather than assuming them. And nothing here delays a filing that a deadline, or advice from your own lawyer, says cannot wait.

Read the calendar for transaction windows. Timing is leverage that has nothing to do with the merits of your claim. A company working through a round of layoffs wants its releases signed and closed. A company in merger or acquisition diligence, or closing a financing, has institutional reasons to resolve departing employees’ paperwork cleanly rather than leave open disputes to be discovered and priced by the other side. You will not always know a window exists. When you do, a complete, specific, private ask that can be approved quickly is worth more inside the window than a larger ask landing after it closes.

One hard number, honestly labelled. Almost every statistic in severance advice traces to marketing rather than measurement, and this module has already warned you about that. The exception worth knowing comes from Pave, which surveyed more than 200 companies on severance practice: about half of companies cap severance, and among those that do, the median cap is 26 weeks at public companies and 12 weeks at private companies. That is a cap, not an entitlement and not an average outcome. Its use is modest and real: it tells you the formula in front of you sits inside a documented range of company practice, set by policy rather than by law, and policies are the things this module exists to ask about.

---

What not to do

• Do not threaten to sue. It converts a human conversation into a legal file, and the file is handled by people whose job is to reduce payouts.
• Do not list grievances. Nobody approving a severance adjustment has authority over the past.
• Do not negotiate verbally only. If you reach agreement on a call, send a short confirming email the same day.
• Do not go silent until the deadline. It wastes the leverage of a live conversation.
• Do not accept “non-negotiable” as the end. Ask who you would address a short written request to, and by when. See Already signed, standard, non-negotiable.

---

If the answer is no

Sometimes it is genuinely no. That is a real outcome and not a failure.

What you still get from having asked: a written record of what you requested and when, clarity about who decides, and in many cases a partial yes on the cheapest item. And you will sign knowing you asked, which is worth something on its own in the months afterward.